May 27, 2019 | Volume 70, Issue 5
Frank J. Colucci Volume 70, Issue 5, 1141-1174 This symposium Article situates Justice Anthony M. Kennedy’s final concurring opinion in Trump v. Hawaii within his larger jurisprudence. Part I traces its separation of powers foundations by examining then-Judge...
May 27, 2019 | Volume 70, Issue 5
The Honorable Marsha Berzon Volume 70, Issue 5, 1175-1184 Full...
May 27, 2019 | Volume 70, Issue 5
Ashutosh Bhagwat Volume 70, Issue 5, 1185-1192 Full...
May 27, 2019 | Volume 70, Issue 5
Erwin Chemerinsky Volume 70, Issue 5, 1193-1198 Full...
May 27, 2019 | Volume 70, Issue 5
Matthew Coles Volume 70, Issue 5, 1199-1206 Full...
May 27, 2019 | Volume 70, Issue 5
Daniel Epps Volume 70, Issue 5, 1207-1212 Full...
May 27, 2019 | Volume 70, Issue 5
Orin S. Kerr Volume 70, Issue 5, 1213-1224 Full...
May 27, 2019 | Volume 70, Issue 5
Leah Litman Volume 70, Issue 5, 1225-1242 Full...
May 27, 2019 | Volume 70, Issue 5
Rory K. Little Volume 70, Issue 5, 1243-1262 During his forty-three years as a federal appellate judge, Anthony M. Kennedy authored over 350 opinions in cases relevant to criminal law (although establishing a precise number using various electronic databases offers a...
May 27, 2019 | Volume 70, Issue 5
Melissa Murray Volume 70, Issue 5, 1263-1272 Full...
May 27, 2019 | Volume 70, Issue 5
Zachary S. Price Volume 70, Issue 5, 1273-1316 Following Justice Kennedy’s retirement and the bitter fight over Justice Kavanaugh’s confirmation, increasingly polarized views about constitutional law in general, and specific constitutional cases in particular,...
May 27, 2019 | Volume 70, Issue 5
Nadine Strossen Volume 70, Issue 5, 1317-1330 Justice Kennedy has been hailed by free speech advocates as a leading free speech champion. In contrast, other experts have not only criticized particular opinions and votes by Justice Kennedy that rejected free speech...
May 27, 2019 | Volume 70, Issue 5
Nina Rose Gliozzo Volume 70, Issue 5, 1331-1387 This Note seeks to explore the way courts engage with claims of racial gerrymandering. The Supreme Court has described judicial oversight of redistricting as an “unwelcome obligation.” These complex cases are both highly...
